This project is designed to promote climate change mitigation and adaptation, maintain biodiversity, and create alternative livelihoods. The 445,339 ha area includes parts of Southern Cardamom National Park and Tatai Wildlife Sanctuary in Cambodia and protects a critical part of the Cardamom Mountains Rainforest Ecoregion—one of the 200 most important locations for biodiversity conservation on the planet.
The project’s climate benefits include avoided emissions of approximately 12 million tCO2e during this first monitoring period and over 115,000 million tCO2e over the project's lifetime. It also generates important biodiversity and community co-benefits, including new and sustainable livelihood opportunities from direct employment and alternative income generating activities (IGAs) to initiatives to stimulate investment in businesses. These opportunities will be designed to reduce pressure on the environment while significantly increasing community well-being.
Additional programs will address food security, improve health and education facilities, as well as raise environmental awareness. Biodiversity co-benefits get a greater protection of the ecosystem predominantly by means of increased security and improved monitoring. The project also protects critical habitat for significant populations of many IUCN-listed species—including the Asian elephant, Asiatic black bear, sun bear, large spotted civet, clouded leopard, and dhole—as well as the critically endangered Siamese crocodile and southern river terrapin.
VCS1748
Credits from this project have a Very Low likelihood of achieving a full tonne of CO2e avoidance or removal.
BeZero Carbon has maintained on ‘rating watch’ the ‘C’ BeZero Carbon Rating assigned to credits issued by the Cambodia-based VCS 1748. This is based on the opinions and reasons expressed below following our analysis of all available information. A 'rating watch' could result in either an upgrade, downgrade, or reaffirmed rating. The rating was first placed on ‘rating watch’ on 22 June 2023 following the standards body’s decision to suspend future issuance in response to stakeholder comments. The standards body subsequently put the project ‘on hold’ on 12 October 2023. The project was taken off hold by the standards body on 10 September 2024. However, given continued reports of stakeholder grievance, the rating will remain on ‘rating watch’ until we consider these issues resolved. The ‘C’ rating reflected our view of significant non-permanence risk due to reports of stakeholder discontent, land insecurity, and the approval of hydropower dams within the project area. The rating also reflected a significant risk of over-crediting as a result of a potentially overestimated baseline, and notable leakage risk driven by the potential for activity displacement beyond the leakage area. However, we do note the project’s strong additionality, driven by high deforestation pressure and the project’s effectiveness in containing this threat across the rated vintage.
The BCR expresses BeZero's opinion that a given carbon credit represents one tonne of CO2e avoided or removed. Making this assessment requires analysing the risks a project is exposed to and how they impact the carbon efficacy of the credits issued. The full details of how the BCR assessment is conducted can be found in the BCR methodology document.
The multi stage process of assessing a credit's carbon efficacy culminates in an analytical view of the likelihood it achieves a tonne of carbon avoided and/or removed. This view is expressed through the rating definition, i.e. the range of likelihoods assigned, and reflected in the rating scale.
The BeZero Carbon Rating follows a robust analytical framework involving detailed assessment of six critical risk factors affecting the quality of credits issues by the project.
Permanence is risk that the carbon avoided or removed by the project will not remain so for the time committed.
Permanence is weighted at 10% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Political Environment is risk that the policy environment undermines the project's carbon effectiveness.
Political Environment is weighted at 5% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Perverse Incentives is risk that benefits from a project, such as offset revenues, incentivise behaviour that reduces the effectiveness.
Perverse Incentives is weighted at 5% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Additionality is risk that a credit purchased and retired does not lead to a tonne of CO2e being avoided or sequestered that would not have otherwise happened.
Additionality is weighted at 50% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Over-crediting is risk that more credits than tonnes of CO2e achieved are issued by a given project due to factors such as unrealistic baseline assumptions.
Over-crediting is weighted at 20% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Leakage is risk that emissions avoided or removed by a project are pushed outside the project boundary.
Leakage is weighted at 10% for determining the final BeZero rating.
You can learn more about the BeZero rating scale on the BeZero website.
Credits from this project have a Very Low likelihood of achieving a full tonne of CO2e avoidance or removal.
VCS1748
VCS1748
Sylvera Rating Categories are a top-level view of a carbon project's claims.
Tier 1 indicates that there is little risk that the claims of a project are overstated.
Tier 2 indicates that the claims may be overstated and that the buyers should analyze the project and carbon credit costs in detail when considering investment.
Tier 3 indicates that there is very high risk that the claims of a project are inaccurate.
Sylvera measures community Co-benefits using the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. When assessing biodiversity impacts, Sylvera evaluates species richness, regional threats to biodiversity, and project actions to reduce pressure on biodiversity. Co-benefits are scored separately, because the primary objective of Sylvera’s overall rating is to evaluate the project claims of GHGs being avoided or removed. For example, a high co-benefits score could inflate a rating, which would be an issue particularly if a project is underperforming in other key areas like carbon, additionality, and permanence. Sylvera’s Co-benefits scores are on a scale of 1 - 5.
Indicates exceptional progression of targeted SDGs, as well as extraordinary species richness and high quality activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Example: The project implements a broad range of SDG activities with extensive reach in the community, operates in a biodiversity hotspot and successfully reduces pressures on the ecosystem.Indicates very limited progression of targeted SDGs, as well as very low species richness and deficient activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Indicates strong progression of targeted SDGs, as well as high species richness and quality activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Indicates average progression of targeted SDGs, as well as average species richness and adequate activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Example: The project implements SDG activities with moderate reach in the community, has average species richness, and takes acceptable action to reduce pressures on biodiversity.Indicates very limited progression of targeted SDGs, as well as very low species richness and deficient activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Indicates narrow progression of targeted SDGs, or low species richness and limited activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Indicates very limited progression of targeted SDGs, as well as very low species richness and deficient activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Example: The project implements limited SDG activities with limited reach in the community, while not taking meaningful action to reduce pressures on biodiversity or its species diversity is low and possibly under low threat.
Sylvera disclaimer
You can learn more about the Sylvera rating scale on the Sylvera website.
Tier 3 indicates that there is very high risk that the claims of a project are inaccurate.
Indicates narrow progression of targeted SDGs, or low species richness and limited activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Sylvera disclaimer
Certifier
Verified Carbon Standard
Registry ID
VCS1748
Crediting period term
Project methodology
VM0009 Methodology for Avoided Ecosystem Conversion | Version 3
Project design document (PDD)
PDD: Southern Cardamom REDD+ Forest Protection
Current verifier of project outcomes
SCS Global Services
Our team of climate experts conducts deep diligence across several parameters of each project. Request access below and we'll be in touch.
Request accessOr send us an email at support@patch.io
The Delta Blue Carbon Project – Phase 1 (DBC-1) is an initiative to promote climate-change mitigation and adaptation, maintain biodiversity and create improved livelihoods, well-being and employment for forest-dependent communities in the project zone, an area comprising 350,000 ha of the Sindh Indus Delta Region in the Thatta and Sujawal districts of Sindh Province in south-eastern Pakistan. The delta is a vast complex of tidal river channels and creeks, low-lying islands, mangrove forests, and inter-tidal areas. Its mangrove forests are unique in being the largest area of arid climate mangroves in the world.
Listed as a global ecoregion in the World Wildlife Fund’s Global 200, the region holds great ecological significance, supporting unique animal and plant species. The Indus River is the main migration route of thousands of birds, which cross over the Himalayas.
VCS2250
Credits from this project have a Moderate likelihood of achieving a full tonne of CO2e avoidance or removal.
BeZero Carbon has assigned a ‘BBB’ BeZero Carbon Rating to credits issued by Pakistan-based VCS2250. This is based on the opinions and reasons expressed in this report following our analysis of all available information. Carbon credits rated ‘BBB’ provide a moderate likelihood of achieving 1 tonne of CO₂e avoidance or removal.
The BCR expresses BeZero's opinion that a given carbon credit represents one tonne of CO2e avoided or removed. Making this assessment requires analysing the risks a project is exposed to and how they impact the carbon efficacy of the credits issued. The full details of how the BCR assessment is conducted can be found in the BCR methodology document.
The multi stage process of assessing a credit's carbon efficacy culminates in an analytical view of the likelihood it achieves a tonne of carbon avoided and/or removed. This view is expressed through the rating definition, i.e. the range of likelihoods assigned, and reflected in the rating scale.
The BeZero Carbon Rating follows a robust analytical framework involving detailed assessment of six critical risk factors affecting the quality of credits issues by the project.
Additionality is risk that a credit purchased and retired does not lead to a tonne of CO2e being avoided or sequestered that would not have otherwise happened.
Additionality is weighted at 50% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Over-crediting is risk that more credits than tonnes of CO2e achieved are issued by a given project due to factors such as unrealistic baseline assumptions.
Over-crediting is weighted at 20% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Leakage is risk that emissions avoided or removed by a project are pushed outside the project boundary.
Leakage is weighted at 10% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Permanence is risk that the carbon avoided or removed by the project will not remain so for the time committed.
Permanence is weighted at 10% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Political Environment is risk that the policy environment undermines the project's carbon effectiveness.
Political Environment is weighted at 5% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Perverse Incentives is risk that benefits from a project, such as offset revenues, incentivise behaviour that reduces the effectiveness.
Perverse Incentives is weighted at 5% for determining the final BeZero rating.
You can learn more about the BeZero rating scale on the BeZero website.
Credits from this project have a Moderate likelihood of achieving a full tonne of CO2e avoidance or removal.
Certifier
Verified Carbon Standard
Registry ID
VCS2250
Crediting period term
Project methodology
VM0033 Methodology for Tidal Wetland and Seagrass Restoration | Version 1.1
Project design document (PDD)
PDD: Indus Delta Blue Carbon Reforestation and Revegetation
Current verifier of project outcomes
AENOR International S.A.U.
Our team of climate experts conducts deep diligence across several parameters of each project. Request access below and we'll be in touch.
Request accessOr send us an email at support@patch.io
This project's goal is to protect and restore 149,800 hectares of peatland ecosystems, offering local people sustainable sources of income while tackling global climate change. The project area stores vast amounts of CO2 and plays a vital role in stabilizing water flows, preventing devastating peat fires, enriching soil nutrients, and providing clean water. Rich in biodiversity, it is home to large populations of many high conservation-value species—including some of the world’s most endangered, such as the Bornean orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) and Proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus)—and is surrounded by villages for which it supports traditional livelihoods, including farming, fishing, and non-timber forest-product harvesting.
The project area is located entirely within state-designated production forest which, without the project, would be converted to fast-growing industrial pulpwood plantations. The project prevents this, having obtained full legal control of the production forest area through an Ecosystem Restoration Concession license, blocking the applications of plantation companies.
This project has completed the additional Climate, Community and Biodiversity (CCB) standards. The forest habitat supports 2 critically endangered, 11 endangered and 31 vulnerable species. Preliminary estimates indicate an estimated population of nearly 4,000 orangutans and 10,000 Bornean gibbons, as well as over 500 Proboscis monkeys. These populations represent over 5% of the remaining global populations of these species. Overall, the project area’s biodiversity includes 157 birds, 67 mammals, 41 reptiles, 8 amphibians, 111 fish, and 314 floral species.
VCS1477
Credits from this project have a Very High likelihood of achieving a full tonne of CO2e avoidance or removal.
BeZero Carbon has removed from ‘rating watch’ and upgraded to ‘AA’ (from ‘A’) the BeZero Carbon Rating assigned to credits issued by Indonesia-based VCS1477. This is based on the opinions and reasons expressed in this report following our analysis of all available information. Carbon credits rated ‘AA’ provide a very high likelihood of achieving 1 tonne of CO₂e avoidance or removal.
The BCR expresses BeZero's opinion that a given carbon credit represents one tonne of CO2e avoided or removed. Making this assessment requires analysing the risks a project is exposed to and how they impact the carbon efficacy of the credits issued. The full details of how the BCR assessment is conducted can be found in the BCR methodology document.
The multi stage process of assessing a credit's carbon efficacy culminates in an analytical view of the likelihood it achieves a tonne of carbon avoided and/or removed. This view is expressed through the rating definition, i.e. the range of likelihoods assigned, and reflected in the rating scale.
The BeZero Carbon Rating follows a robust analytical framework involving detailed assessment of six critical risk factors affecting the quality of credits issues by the project.
Leakage is risk that emissions avoided or removed by a project are pushed outside the project boundary.
Leakage is weighted at 10% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Political Environment is risk that the policy environment undermines the project's carbon effectiveness.
Political Environment is weighted at 5% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Additionality is risk that a credit purchased and retired does not lead to a tonne of CO2e being avoided or sequestered that would not have otherwise happened.
Additionality is weighted at 50% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Over-crediting is risk that more credits than tonnes of CO2e achieved are issued by a given project due to factors such as unrealistic baseline assumptions.
Over-crediting is weighted at 20% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Perverse Incentives is risk that benefits from a project, such as offset revenues, incentivise behaviour that reduces the effectiveness.
Perverse Incentives is weighted at 5% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Permanence is risk that the carbon avoided or removed by the project will not remain so for the time committed.
Permanence is weighted at 10% for determining the final BeZero rating.
You can learn more about the BeZero rating scale on the BeZero website.
Credits from this project have a Very High likelihood of achieving a full tonne of CO2e avoidance or removal.
VCS1477
Sylvera Rating Categories are a top-level view of a carbon project's claims.
Tier 1 indicates that there is little risk that the claims of a project are overstated.
Tier 2 indicates that the claims may be overstated and that the buyers should analyze the project and carbon credit costs in detail when considering investment.
Tier 3 indicates that there is very high risk that the claims of a project are inaccurate.
Sylvera measures community Co-benefits using the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. When assessing biodiversity impacts, Sylvera evaluates species richness, regional threats to biodiversity, and project actions to reduce pressure on biodiversity. Co-benefits are scored separately, because the primary objective of Sylvera’s overall rating is to evaluate the project claims of GHGs being avoided or removed. For example, a high co-benefits score could inflate a rating, which would be an issue particularly if a project is underperforming in other key areas like carbon, additionality, and permanence. Sylvera’s Co-benefits scores are on a scale of 1 - 5.
Indicates exceptional progression of targeted SDGs, as well as extraordinary species richness and high quality activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Example: The project implements a broad range of SDG activities with extensive reach in the community, operates in a biodiversity hotspot and successfully reduces pressures on the ecosystem.Indicates very limited progression of targeted SDGs, as well as very low species richness and deficient activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Indicates strong progression of targeted SDGs, as well as high species richness and quality activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Indicates average progression of targeted SDGs, as well as average species richness and adequate activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Example: The project implements SDG activities with moderate reach in the community, has average species richness, and takes acceptable action to reduce pressures on biodiversity.Indicates very limited progression of targeted SDGs, as well as very low species richness and deficient activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Indicates narrow progression of targeted SDGs, or low species richness and limited activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Indicates very limited progression of targeted SDGs, as well as very low species richness and deficient activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Example: The project implements limited SDG activities with limited reach in the community, while not taking meaningful action to reduce pressures on biodiversity or its species diversity is low and possibly under low threat.
Sylvera disclaimer
You can learn more about the Sylvera rating scale on the Sylvera website.
Tier 1 indicates that there is little risk that the claims of a project are overstated.
Indicates strong progression of targeted SDGs, as well as high species richness and quality activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Sylvera disclaimer
Certifier
Verified Carbon Standard
Registry ID
VCS1477
Crediting period term
Project methodology
VM0007 REDD+ Methodology Framework (REDD-MF) | Version 1.5
Project design document (PDD)
PDD: Katingan REDD+ Forest Protection
Current verifier of project outcomes
Aster Global Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Our team of climate experts conducts deep diligence across several parameters of each project. Request access below and we'll be in touch.
Request accessOr send us an email at support@patch.io