Together with our local implementation partners and smallholder farmer communities, Carboneers develops decentralized biochar projects with the aim to provide in much needed carbon dioxide removal. In our Indian Carboneers project, we are very proud to work with Rajesh Aggarwal. He has a lot of experience in working agricultural NGOs and farming communities throughout India. Together, we provide farmers with the right training, tools and technology, in order to convert biomass to biochar. Biochar is an inert carbonized material that is a stable carbon sink for over a thousand years!
And besides being a direct carbon sink, biochar offers great beneficial characteristics in tropical agriculture; it stores nutrients, increasing crop yields; it increases the water holding capacity, aiding in climate adaptivity; and it houses microorganisms, raising the organic carbon content of degraded soils. Combined, we work with 3000 farming communities who convert their agricultural rice straw, corn, fruit tree trimmings, cotton, millet & sorghum stalks to biochar. Every step in the biochar production and application is registered by our supervisors and management team, with a Penn State University provided mobile application. The project is audited by Ceres Cert and certified by Carbon Standards International under the Global Artisan C-Sink Standard. And added together, our Ghanaian Carboneers have the capacity to sequester 75.000 tons of carbon dioxide on a yearly basis!
Often, biochar is made with million-dollar installations, but in rural agricultural areas in the Global South, the infrastructure lacks to make this feasible, though there is a lot of agricultural biomass burned uncontrollably and left out for decay. Carboneers specifically focuses on decentralized biochar production the farming communities, where often climate change strikes hardest, profit the most when they produce their own biochar. Farmers profit predominantly from crop yield increase and an additional income, derived from the application of biochar to their soils and the sales of carbon credits.
Carbon sequestration is for our projects a portal to open up a lot more socio-economic benefits for these communities. Benefits, that on its own, usually nobody is willing to pay for. With the ability to produce certified biochar, farming communities can escape the vicious circle of poverty and they can mitigate the detrimental effects of climate change to their soils. By providing the right handles to farming communities, decentralized biochar projects in the Global South contribute to a lot of the Sustainable Development Goals. We see this as a win-win-win situation.
Certifier
Global Artisan C-Sink
Registry ID
GCSP1024
Project registration date
Crediting period term
Project methodology
Global Artisan C-Sink
Project design document (PDD)
PDD: Dutch Carboneers India Biochar
Current verifier of project outcomes
CERES-cert
Our team of climate experts conducts deep diligence across several parameters of each project. Request access below and we'll be in touch.
This project's goal is to protect and restore 149,800 hectares of peatland ecosystems, offering local people sustainable sources of income while tackling global climate change. The project area stores vast amounts of CO2 and plays a vital role in stabilizing water flows, preventing devastating peat fires, enriching soil nutrients, and providing clean water. Rich in biodiversity, it is home to large populations of many high conservation-value species—including some of the world’s most endangered, such as the Bornean orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) and Proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus)—and is surrounded by villages for which it supports traditional livelihoods, including farming, fishing, and non-timber forest-product harvesting.
The project area is located entirely within state-designated production forest which, without the project, would be converted to fast-growing industrial pulpwood plantations. The project prevents this, having obtained full legal control of the production forest area through an Ecosystem Restoration Concession license, blocking the applications of plantation companies.
This project has completed the additional Climate, Community and Biodiversity (CCB) standards. The forest habitat supports 2 critically endangered, 11 endangered and 31 vulnerable species. Preliminary estimates indicate an estimated population of nearly 4,000 orangutans and 10,000 Bornean gibbons, as well as over 500 Proboscis monkeys. These populations represent over 5% of the remaining global populations of these species. Overall, the project area’s biodiversity includes 157 birds, 67 mammals, 41 reptiles, 8 amphibians, 111 fish, and 314 floral species.
Certifier
Verified Carbon Standard
Registry ID
VCS1477
Crediting period term
Project methodology
VM0007 REDD+ Methodology Framework (REDD-MF) | Version 1.5
Project design document (PDD)
PDD: Katingan REDD+ Forest Protection
Current verifier of project outcomes
Aster Global Environmental Solutions, Inc.
The Katingan Peatland Restoration and Conservation Project is a large-scale REDD+ initiative in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. The project is notable for its robust MRV system, strong track record, and plethora of environmental and social co-benefits.
By avoiding the conversion of ~150kha of peatland into acacia plantations, the project makes a strong case for its additionality, bolstered by its sole reliance on carbon revenues for financial sustainability. Since 2011, the first year for which the project issued credits, Katingan has boasted a strong delivery record with over 35 million tonnes CO₂e avoided to date. The project’s multifaceted MRV system, combining satellite imagery with field sampling and community surveys, further improves its long-term credibility.
Short-term constraints stem from Indonesia’s evolving carbon governance and registry alignment (SRN/NEK), which have caused the project to temporarily pause new issuance of credits. Despite this, Patch views Katingan as a highly credible, impactful REDD+ project offering measurable climate and social outcomes.
As a large-scale REDD+ initiative in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, Katingan avoids and removes emissions through a combination of avoided planned deforestation, peatland conservation & rewetting, and reforestation. Its baseline scenario reflects its original designation for development as an acacia plantation for timber and pulp, demonstrating high additionality of the carbon project. Patch’s confidence in the project’s additionality is corroborated by external analyses from rating agencies Sylvera and BeZero, both of which have assigned high ratings to project’s additionality.
Financial & Policy Additionality
The project is extremely robust in its claims of financial additionality. Not only is the project entirely dependent on carbon finance, inherently making a strong case for its financial additionality, its establishment required forgoing conversion to profitable pulpwood plantations, representing a significant opportunity cost. On regulatory additionality, the project is not mandated by any law, statute or other regulatory framework pertaining to the forestry and land-use sector in Indonesia. While Patch, along with Sylvera and BeZero, notes emerging policy risks from the recent establishment of Indonesia’s national registry system (SRN) – which Katingan is expected to transition into and withhold a portion of VCM credits for – this policy transition does not affect the additionality of the project.
Leakage
While leakage can be a risk with projects under the VM0007 methodology, especially when activities significantly shift commodity production (as is the case with Katingan), Patch believes the project has sufficiently addressed this through its conservative deductions of estimated emissions impact to account for market leakage, calculated in accordance with the methodology. Ecological leakage, a concern in peatland systems due to their interlinked hydrology, is actively managed through extensive peatland rewetting, restoring water levels and preventing subsidence and fire spread into neighboring areas. Furthermore, BeZero’s analysis did not find evidence of leakage as a result of avoiding land-use conversion – a conclusion supported by satellite monitoring and land use trends in surrounding areas.
Permanence
Katingan issues credits over a 60 year period, which is above standard for typical REDD+ projects. The project sets a 10% buffer pool contribution to account for non-permanence risk, in alignment with its use of Verra’s AFOLU Non-Permanence Risk Tool. The biggest risks originally identified by the developer include the project’s ability to obtain concession licenses and land use rights for the entire project area (2016-May-11 Revised Final PDD_RMU_clean (1).pdf, p. 248, found on the project registry) – an issue that has since been resolved; typical environmental risks associated with REDD+ projects, such as fire, drought, and pests, were found to have minimal impact on the peat carbon layer, which is the primary carbon pool for this project. Both Sylvera and BeZero have cited current permanence risks to be driven by Indonesia’s complex forest governance structure and political uncertainties, such as misalignment between local and national policies. However, these risks were deemed to be manageable with existing safeguards.
Further details on the project’s additionality can be found in the project registry (2016-May-11 Revised Final PDD_RMU_clean (1).pdf, p.92)
The main carbon pools included in the project are aboveground tree biomass, as well as peatland. Other pools, such as aboveground non-tree biomass, or litter, were conservatively excluded, with project activities expected to increase those pools. Further details on project boundaries and GHG gas accounting can be found in the project registry (2016-May-11 Revised Final PDD_RMU_clean (1).pdf, p.89-92).
Katingan is known for its robust MRV system, combining a range of remote sensing and field sampling techniques with stratified emission accounting and peat-specific GHG analysis. Satellite imagery to detect land use change (and estimate corresponding emissions) is analyzed annually, complemented by 91 permanent sample plots that are monitored on a five-year basis. This layered approach to MRV, along with monitoring systems for microbial decomposition of peat and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in water bodies, was recognized by Sylvera as a driver of the project’s minimal over-crediting risk. Furthermore, real-time fire detection systems and biodiversity monitoring have also been established to reduce fire-related emissions and track co-benefits.
Additional details about the project’s MRV system can be found in the project registry (2016-May-11 Revised Final PDD_RMU_clean (1).pdf, p.214-221).
To date, the project has avoided over 35 MtCO₂e emissions, with verified credits issued for vintages up to 2020. Aside from Katingan, which the project developer, PT Rimba Makmur Utama (RMU), has been working on for over a decade, RMU has also developed other nature-based solution projects, including:
The project’s team consists of a network of stakeholders led by RMU, combining internal experience in forestry, climate finance, and environmental policy with external partners for MRV integrity, scientific expertise, and community engagement. Key leadership, technical experts, and collaborating stakeholders include:
Notable buyers of Katingan’s credits include Boeing, Volkswagen, Singapore Airlines, CGI, and Standard Chartered Bank, all of whom have independently performed extensive due diligence.
SDG Alignment
Katingan aligns with multiple SDGs, notably:
Details on SDG impact can be found in the project registry (VCS CCB Katingan Project Monitoring Report 2019 Final.pdf, p.20).
Certification & Quality Assurance
The project adheres to rigorous standards set by the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) and the Climate, Community, and Biodiversity (CCB) Standards. Through the VCS, the project is held to high standards of environmental integrity, transparency, and community impact, verified through regular third-party audits. Additionally, the project is certified under Climate, Community, and Biodiversity (CCB) Standards, meaning the project will deliver exceptional contributions to climate adaptation, biodiversity preservation, and community development, further ensuring quality assurance across all activities.
Ecological Benefits
Katingan protects an ecologically vital peat ecosystem, home to orangutans, gibbons, and numerous endangered species. By preventing deforestation and maintaining forest connectivity, the project preserves large tracts of contiguous habitat – essential for many of these species. Furthermore, in protecting and restoring the peatland, the project is able to deliver on a range of air, soil, and water co-benefits. Not only does the minimization of peat fires reduce transboundary haze in the region, significantly improving air quality, the rewetting of peatland stabilizes the water table, preserving soil structure and maintaining hydrological functions such as the provision of clean water.
Social & Economic Benefits
Over 500 jobs for local community members have been created as a result of project activities, particularly in fire patrols, nurseries, and monitoring. The project has also established a benefit-sharing mechanism with surrounding communities, wherein carbon revenues are reinvested into sustainable enterprises (e.g. production of virgin coconut oil and biodegradable seedling bags), public health services (e.g. support for 25 Posyandu community health centers), and educational support. Benefit-sharing is managed through Community Investment Funds, with field reporting and monitoring to promote transparency in fund allocation.
The Katingan Project is one of the world’s largest peatland REDD+ projects, covering 149,800 hectares and generating an average of 5–7 million tCO₂e in annual emissions reductions. To date, it has avoided over 35 million tonnes of CO₂e, with verified credits issued for vintages up to 2020. While future credit issuance is currently paused pending integration into Indonesia’s SRN/NEK systems, the project is well-positioned to adapt.
Patch considers the project type to have moderate potential for scalability in the region. Katingan’s own expansion potential is constrained by the Ecosystem Restoration Concession (ERC) it secured for the project – a novel and rarely used legal designation in Indonesia that allows for forest conservation in lieu of production. While there is no shortage of demand for peatland restoration in Indonesia – the country is home to more than 13Mha of peatlands, which have been under immense pressure from agricultural expansion and palm oil production – realizing this potential is complicated by Indonesia’s complex and evolving policy developments regarding forestry and carbon markets. Future growth depends on integration with Indonesia’s SRN/NEK schemes, which are still being finalized. Still, despite future regulatory uncertainty, Katingan stands as a benchmark for large-scale peatland REDD+ initiatives, demonstrating how high-integrity conservation efforts can deliver climate impact at scale.
Credits from this project have a Very High likelihood of achieving a full tonne of CO2e avoidance or removal.
VCS1477
The BCR expresses BeZero's opinion that a given carbon credit represents one tonne of CO2e avoided or removed. Making this assessment requires analysing the risks a project is exposed to and how they impact the carbon efficacy of the credits issued. The full details of how the BCR assessment is conducted can be found in the BCR methodology document.
The multi stage process of assessing a credit's carbon efficacy culminates in an analytical view of the likelihood it achieves a tonne of carbon avoided and/or removed. This view is expressed through the rating definition, i.e. the range of likelihoods assigned, and reflected in the rating scale.
The BeZero Carbon Rating follows a robust analytical framework involving detailed assessment of six critical risk factors affecting the quality of credits issues by the project.
Leakage is risk that emissions avoided or removed by a project are pushed outside the project boundary.
Leakage is weighted at 10% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Political Environment is risk that the policy environment undermines the project's carbon effectiveness.
Political Environment is weighted at 5% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Additionality is risk that a credit purchased and retired does not lead to a tonne of CO2e being avoided or sequestered that would not have otherwise happened.
Additionality is weighted at 50% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Over-crediting is risk that more credits than tonnes of CO2e achieved are issued by a given project due to factors such as unrealistic baseline assumptions.
Over-crediting is weighted at 20% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Perverse Incentives is risk that benefits from a project, such as offset revenues, incentivise behaviour that reduces the effectiveness.
Perverse Incentives is weighted at 5% for determining the final BeZero rating.
Permanence is risk that the carbon avoided or removed by the project will not remain so for the time committed.
Permanence is weighted at 10% for determining the final BeZero rating.
You can learn more about the BeZero rating scale on the BeZero website.
VCS1477
Sylvera Rating Categories are a top-level view of a carbon project's claims.
Tier 1 indicates that there is little risk that the claims of a project are overstated.
Tier 2 indicates that the claims may be overstated and that the buyers should analyze the project and carbon credit costs in detail when considering investment.
Tier 3 indicates that there is very high risk that the claims of a project are inaccurate.
Sylvera measures community Co-benefits using the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. When assessing biodiversity impacts, Sylvera evaluates species richness, regional threats to biodiversity, and project actions to reduce pressure on biodiversity. Co-benefits are scored separately, because the primary objective of Sylvera’s overall rating is to evaluate the project claims of GHGs being avoided or removed. For example, a high co-benefits score could inflate a rating, which would be an issue particularly if a project is underperforming in other key areas like carbon, additionality, and permanence. Sylvera’s Co-benefits scores are on a scale of 1 - 5.
Indicates exceptional progression of targeted SDGs, as well as extraordinary species richness and high quality activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Example: The project implements a broad range of SDG activities with extensive reach in the community, operates in a biodiversity hotspot and successfully reduces pressures on the ecosystem.Indicates very limited progression of targeted SDGs, as well as very low species richness and deficient activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Indicates strong progression of targeted SDGs, as well as high species richness and quality activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Indicates average progression of targeted SDGs, as well as average species richness and adequate activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Example: The project implements SDG activities with moderate reach in the community, has average species richness, and takes acceptable action to reduce pressures on biodiversity.Indicates very limited progression of targeted SDGs, as well as very low species richness and deficient activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Indicates narrow progression of targeted SDGs, or low species richness and limited activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Indicates very limited progression of targeted SDGs, as well as very low species richness and deficient activities to reduce pressure on biodiversity.
Example: The project implements limited SDG activities with limited reach in the community, while not taking meaningful action to reduce pressures on biodiversity or its species diversity is low and possibly under low threat.
Sylvera disclaimer
You can learn more about the Sylvera rating scale on the Sylvera website.
Tier 1 indicates that there is little risk that the claims of a project are overstated.